the Property Law website

Maintained by Gary Webber, barrister

Home Page > Property law > Property Law Library > Landlord and tenant (general) > Set-off

Home Page
Property law
Contact


Assignment
Consents
Construction of lease terms
Discrimination
Disclaimer
Disrepair
Distress
Estoppel
Forfeiture
Goods left on the premises
Indemnity
Insolvency
L & T (Covenants) Act 1995
Lease or licence
Management regulations
Nuisance
Notices and break clauses
Pre-emption clause
Rent
Rent review
Rent suspension
Restraint of trade
Service charges (general)
Service charge code
Set-off
Subletting, sharing possession or occupation
Surrender by operation of law
Surrender and re-grant
Tenancy at will
Unlawful eviction

Current page

Site Editors

Gary Webber
(General Editor)
John Martin
(Deputy editor)
Nigel Clayton
(Mortgages)
Peta Dollar
(Property transactions)
Daniel Dovar
(Residential tenancies and Property litigation)
Michael Garson
(Home information packs)
Piers Harrison
(Long leases)
Emma Humphreys
(Easements and Restrictive covenants)
Saira Sheikh
(Planning)
Sarah Thompson-Copsey
(Landlord and tenant - General)
Stephanie Tozer
(Nuisance and trespass)



Set-off


This page contains material dealing with
  • The right (or otherwise) of a tenant to set-off a valid claim against his landlord against the new landlord after the reversion has been assigned; and
  • Anti-set off clauses.

Set-off by tenant after landlord has assigned the reversion

Arrears accruing prior to assignment of the reversion

Smith v Muscat
[2003] EWCA Civ 962

Introduction

In a lease to which the Landlord and Tenant (Covenant) Act 1995 does not apply, on assignment of a landlord's interest in the property, the right to the rent including arrears passes to the landlord by virtue of s141 of the Law of Property Act 1925. By virtue of s142 the new landlord becomes liable to comply with the landlord's obligations under the lease but he is not liable in damages for breaches that occurred prior to the date of the assignment of the landlord's interest (Duncliffe v Caerfelin Properties Ltd [1989] 2 EGLR 38).

Facts

In this case T was a Rent Act tenant. In December 1995 T began to withhold rent from his landlord because of disrepair. In 1999 the landlord sold the reversion to the new landlord. T continued to withhold rent. The new landlord served a notice to quit and commenced possession proceedings. The judge held that T was entitled ... THIS IS AN EXTRACT OF THE FULL TEXT. TO GET THE FULL TEXT, SEE BELOW

Purchase options
Buy this page £10 + VAT (1 year)
Buy whole site £99 + VAT (1 year)
Existing members, to login click => here