the Property Law website

Maintained by Gary Webber, barrister

Home Page > Property law > Property Law Library > Long leases > Variation of lease terms

Home Page
Property law
Contact


Enfranchisement
Forfeiture restrictions
Ground rent
Management
Right to manage
Manager under 1987 Act
Part 1 of the 1954 Act
Right of first refusal
Service charges and insurance
Variation of lease terms

Current page

Site Editors

Gary Webber
(General Editor)
John Martin
(Deputy editor)
Nigel Clayton
(Mortgages)
Peta Dollar
(Property transactions)
Daniel Dovar
(Residential tenancies)
Michael Garson
(Home information packs)
Piers Harrison
(Long leases)
Emma Humphreys
(Easements and restrictive covenants)
Saira Sheikh
(Planning)
Sarah Thompson-Copsey
(Landlord and tenant - General)



Variation of lease terms


Extent of power

Gianfrancesco v Haughton
Lands Tribunal, President
LRX/10/2007

Summary

The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal has power under s38 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 to vary a lease that fails to make satisfactory provisions with respect to one or more of the matters mentioned in s35. However, it will not do so merely because the lease is not in modern form.

Facts

T had a top floor flat in a mid-terrace house and was under an obligation to redecorate and maintain the exterior of the flat. This was difficult at the rear because access the whole of the rear garden was covered by a conservatory that belonged to the ground floor flat, occupied by L. L refused to help beyond allowing the tenant to remove the conservatory roof panels, at her own expense and risk. L sought to impose the obligation on the landlord and to introduce a service charge clause.

Decision

LVT refused to vary the lease terms and that decision was upheld on this appeal. Whether the lease fails to make satisfactory provision is one for the tribunal to judge in all the circumstances of the case. However, "a lease does not fail to make satisfactory provision simply because it could have been better or more explicitly drafted. For instance the need to imply a term is not necessarily, or even probably, an indication that the lease fails to make satisfactory provision for the matter in question." The LVT accepted that the system of covenants contained in the lease were not modern or conventional but they were satisfactory and workable.

Back to top