Home Page > Research and guidance > Landlord and tenant (general) > Goods left on the premises

Home Page
Contact
Editorial Team

Assignment
Break clauses
Chattels and fixtures
Business rates
Consents
Construction of lease terms
Dilapidations
Discrimination
Disclaimer
Distress
Estoppel
Forfeiture
Goods left on the premises
Indemnity
Insolvency
L & T (Covenants) Act 1995
Licences
Management regulations
Merger
Nuisance
Notices - service
Pre-emption clause
Rent
Rent review
Rent suspension
Restraint of trade
Service charges and insurance (general)
Set-off
Subletting, sharing possession or occupation
Surrender by operation of law
Surrender and re-grant
Tenancy at will
Uncertain term
Unlawful eviction

Current page






Goods left on the premises

Question

What does a landlord do with goods left on the premises after the tenant has left? Can he throw them on the street? Can he sell them? Must he look after them for ever?

This case was actually concerned with a charging order. D had been awarded costs of 40,000 and enforced the order against C by charging order. There was subsequently an order for sale and possession was obtained. There was then an issue in relation to goods left on the premises. There was a dispute as to the extent to which C had been given an opportunity to collect all his belongings. The house was then sold and on the sale the purchaser removed the contents. C now claimed that D had unlawfully seized, detained and disposed of his goods. The court refused to strike out the claim and said that the matter should go to trial. By leaving goods on the premises C had failed to give vacant possession. However, the judge held that D could be said to be an involuntary bailer with a duty to act reasonably in regard to the goods left on the premises.

Scotland v Solomon [2002] EWHC 1886, ChD, D Kitchin QC sitting as a Deputy. (Solicitors Journal, 4 October 2002, LawBrief).


Earlier cases

For earlier cases on this subject in the landlord and tenant context see Alionby v Cohen [1955] 1 QB 559 and also Jones v Gospel [1998] EGCS 108 which would seem to suggest that putting out the goods whilst taking reasonable care not to cause damage is OK (subject of course to the Protection from Eviction Act 1977):
    To place or leave a chattel on the land of another without consent is a trespass and the owner of the land is entitled, taking reasonable care in the circumstances, to remove the offending chattel (Jones v Gospel).
However, to sell the goods otherwise in accordance with the provisions of the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 would not be ok.

Back to top


If you have found this page useful, you may be interested in the following:

Options
Free Summaries £nil
Full Membership From £207 + VAT (1 year)