Home Page > Property Law Library > Property transactions > Defective Premises Act

Home Page
Contact
Editorial Team

Contract
Deeds
Defective Premises Act
Deposits
Execution
Failure to complete
Fraud
Gifts of land
Guarantees and indemnities
Land Registration
Land Registration Reform
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Notice to complete
Options
Overage
Planning obligations
Perpetuities
Positive covenants
Reasonable endeavours
Rent charges
Title
Vendor's lien
Writing - s2 of 1989 Act

Current page






Defective Premises Act

Liability under Section 1?

Work in the course of a business

Zennstrom v Fagot
[2013] EWHC 288 (TCC)

Where the vendors of a property had undertaken a complete redevelopment of that property with the intention of making a home to live in, but then through force of financial circumstances were forced to sell, they had not undertaken work “in the course of a business which consists of or includes providing or arranging for the provision of dwellings”. Accordingly they were not liable to the purchasers under s1 of the Defective Premises Act 1972 for defects in the property.


Back to top

If you would like to subscribe to the full monthly update please click below.

Options
Monthly Updates From £207 + VAT (1 year)
(Free for charities and students)