Article contributed by Geraint Wheatley – Kings Chambers Does the Tate Modern viewing gallery case amount to evolution or revolution in ‘overlooking’ claims, and more generally? Are the floodgates open? Case name, reference and Bailii link: Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4 https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2023/4.html Summary The Supreme Court clearly sets out the principles to be applied in nuisance cases of all kinds. As a matter of principle, “visual intrusion” can constitute…
This content is available on our subscription plans - join today for full access to the legal library