The online resource for UK Property Law

The decision in All England Lawn Tennis Ground Ltd v Save Wimbledon Park Ltd (March 2026) is a significant case concerning development land and historic property rights. The case concerned whether land forming part of a golf club in Wimbledon was subject to a statutory trust for public recreation under Section 164 of the Public Health Act 1875. At the heart of the dispute was the proposed expansion of the Wimbledon Championships, a project estimated to cost approximately £200 million and intended to increase the tournament’s capacity and facilities.

The case required the court to determine whether legal obligations affecting Wimbledon Park restricted the ability of the All England Club to redevelop land previously occupied and used as a golf course. The court examined whether the land was subject to a statutory trust requiring it to remain available for public recreational purposes. The outcome provides important guidance on how historic property rights can affect modern development schemes.

Background of the case

The All England Club had acquired land adjacent to its existing Wimbledon site as part of a long-term strategy to expand the Championships. The proposed development included numerous additional tennis courts together with a new show court designed to enhance the tournament’s infrastructure and future growth.

However, the project faced opposition from local campaign group ‘Save Wimbledon Park Ltd’. The campaign group argued that the land was burdened by legal obligations dating back many years and that these obligations prevented redevelopment for private sporting facilities. The campaigners suggested that the land was held under a statutory trust that required it to be preserved for public recreation and enjoyment.

As a result, the court was asked to decide whether those alleged trust obligations existed and, if so, whether they restricted the proposed development.

The Legal Question

The principal issue concerned the legal status of the former golf course land. The Save Wimbledon Park campaign group contended that statutory provisions governing public open spaces had created a trust over the land, imposing obligations that continued to bind future owners.

If the campaign group's argument was correct, the consequences for the development would be considerable. Land held on trust for public recreational purposes cannot simply be repurposed for commercial development if doing so conflicts with the terms of the trust. The existence of such rights would present a significant obstacle to the expansion plans.

The All England Club maintained that no trust had ever arisen. It was argued that the golf course had never been appropriated for public recreation and had consistently been used as a private golf course.